Double eviction

[billybathgate]

According to a few of the tabloids today, this Friday will see a double eviction, with the person receiving the most votes (Ahmed?) being allowed to choose one other housemate to follow him out of the house.

Presuming Michelle (and Jason) is exempt as she passed her task, who will he take with him?

Nadia, or Dan?

I hope it's Dan, he makes my eyes bleed.

[Sparkle]

He'll take Stuart, to make Michelle cry.

[Mimternet]

No that is so wrong! That can't happen. Ahmed will take Nadia down with him!! Or Michelle if he is allowed.

This cannot happen, it is up to the public to decide who leaves.

[Sparkle]

I'm not sure it will happen either.

Incidentally I was browsing the official BB site forums (fora?) and could not believe the level of illiteracy on there. Here is a sample, taken from a thread entitled "Emma's Coming Back", which chronicled a rumour that Emma will be back in the house as of Saturday.

MOUSEMAT I INTENTIONALLY SAID EDIOT BCOS UR MORE THAN A IDIOT. LOOK AT YOUR BLOODY TOPIC, "EMMA'S COMING BACK", WRONG. STOP BUNKING SCHOOL AND LEARN SOMETHING, IT SHOULD BE "EMMA IS COMING BACK", "EMMA'S" MEANS ITS HERS OR SHE OWNS IT. FOOLISH BOY

[billybathgate]

Sparkle said:

He'll take Stuart, to make Michelle cry.

That would quite possibly make me piss myself laughing.

Unfortunately, I don't know if Ahmed has the clarity of thought that would allow him to come to that conclusion.

[si]

I hope this isn't true, as I think there might be begrudging respect for Dan. He's voted Nadia every week of nominations, hasn't he?

Nads must be saved. Boyfriend and I just rock all the way through whenever Nadia's on screen.

If it's a double eviction, it'll be Ahmed and Victor, no?

[trollte]

I think there will be a public outcry if this is allowed to happen. Especially if he takes Nadia or Michelle.

I bet you 10p they allow him to see what everyone has said about him first. And then let him choose. He won't be able to decided.

Mimternet is right. We should choose who goes. The fucking catchphrase of the show is "Who goes? You decide..."

[billybathgate]

si said:

If it's a double eviction, it'll be Ahmed and Victor, no?

Not if it's Ahmed that gets to chose who the second evictee is. I think it'll be either Dan, Nadia, or Michelle (if he's allowed to chose her).

[billybathgate]

trollte said:

Mimternet is right. We should choose who goes. The fucking catchphrase of the show is "Who goes? You decide..."

Just like we chose that Kitten and Emma left?

[si]

billybathgate said:

Not if it's Ahmed that gets to chose who the second evictee is. I think it'll be either Dan, Nadia, or Michelle (if he's allowed to chose her).

I realise that, because it's what I said in the first half of that post.

[billybathgate]

si said:

I realise that, because it's what I said in the first half of that post.

I misread you, sorry. I read the bit about Dan, then the bit about Nadia and saw it as being Dan nominating Nadia every week.

I shall now go back to my darkened room and drink several coffees.

[zaffra]

If this happends Ahmed has said his war is with Michelle and Dan, if he can't choose Michelle then it will be Dan.

Although given the choice he would take Michelle out first because he is spiteful and narrow minded.

I think it would be most unfair to let the show go this way, and add nothing to the situation in the house, the housemates won't know how the eviction has taken place, and the evictee won't know why they've been evicted until they get out, and then there's nothing that they can do about it.

While I do believe that Stu likes Michelle, I get the feeling he wouldn't be too upset to have a bit of a breather, the house makes it all pretty intense and he isn't always comfortable with her.

[dizzie]

Although there’s no way to prove it until tomorrow night when it doesn’t happen, I don’t think that Endemol would ever have an extra eviction without wringing every last penny out of the event. If there were to be a double, we would have been told about it and encouraged to repeat dial for whomever. Voting figures, traditionally Endemol’s biggest money spinner, have been way down on previous years and they can’t afford to lose another contestant for free.

One thing the producers have learnt from 4 previous series of BB is that the fewer people in the house, the less interesting the show is. I think they want to keep the maximum number of people in until the very last minute. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are 5 people still in there in the final week, with maybe a ‘surprise’ midweek eviction to reduce it to the final 4 on the last night. I expect that Dan, Michelle, Nadia, Stuart and Shell will make it to the final week (although I’d swap Shell for Victor for a perfect line-up.). Jason is a dead cert for next week, and I think a combination of Dan, Nadia, Victor and Shell will face the final public eviction, with Victor (unfortunately) losing out. The final set of nominations depends entirely on whether Nadia is nicotine deprived and goes nuts. In the absence of Ahmed, she’s the only really volatile person in there and could pretty much put herself up for eviction based on the way she behaves in that week.

[Mimternet]

With Ahmed gone it is all going to start getting a little too nice. At least with Jason, Nadia, Dan, Michelle and Victor in the house there is still potential for arguments.

It would definitely be either Michelle (if he can) or Nadia that gets taken out if this were to happen. The two favourites that the nation would actually want to vote to keep in, I'm with the guy above who says Endemol won't want to lose that money. It's time evictions went back to normal as it isn't as much fun with all of these fixed nominations even if the tasks create unmissable viewing earlier in the week.

[Steven]

Sparkle said:

MOUSEMAT I INTENTIONALLY SAID EDIOT BCOS UR MORE THAN A IDIOT. LOOK AT YOUR BLOODY TOPIC, "EMMA'S COMING BACK", WRONG. STOP BUNKING SCHOOL AND LEARN SOMETHING, IT SHOULD BE "EMMA IS COMING BACK", "EMMA'S" MEANS ITS HERS OR SHE OWNS IT. FOOLISH BOY

That actually made me cry. On the one hand, it's nice that someone has got to grips with the grammatical rules behind the ownership apostrophe used with "it", but on the other hand I can't believe they've applied it in a global sense like that.

[elmsyrup]

Sparkle said:

I'm not sure it will happen either.

Incidentally I was browsing the official BB site forums (fora?) and could not believe the level of illiteracy on there. Here is a sample, taken from a thread entitled "Emma's Coming Back", which chronicled a rumour that Emma will be back in the house as of Saturday.

MOUSEMAT I INTENTIONALLY SAID EDIOT BCOS UR MORE THAN A IDIOT. LOOK AT YOUR BLOODY TOPIC, "EMMA'S COMING BACK", WRONG. STOP BUNKING SCHOOL AND LEARN SOMETHING, IT SHOULD BE "EMMA IS COMING BACK", "EMMA'S" MEANS ITS HERS OR SHE OWNS IT. FOOLISH BOY

Where exactly was that? I would love to see the replies!

[Steven]

I've just noticed the real tearjerker of that message:

"EMMA'S" MEANS ITS HERS

That "its" needs an apostrophe.

[Sparkle]

Shocking, isn't it? It's on the official BB sitewww.channel4.com/bigbrother and click on Community. It's the thread called "Emma's Coming Back".

[elmsyrup]

Sparkle said:

Shocking, isn't it? It's on the official BB sitewww.channel4.com/bigbrother and click on Community. It's the thread called "Emma's Coming Back".

The trouble is that there are loads of different forums and the main one (which I assume it's on) has hundreds of posts every hour, so without a direct link it cannot be found.