|
Post by Dr Onion on Mar 15, 2007 10:23:13 GMT
You're asking if a walking shagpile carpet could mate with a tribal teddy bear?!
You scare me!
|
|
|
Post by saint on Mar 15, 2007 11:07:47 GMT
You're asking if a walking shagpile carpet could mate with a tribal teddy bear?! You scare me! I scare myself sometimes, anyway do you think it could happen
|
|
|
Post by Dr Onion on Mar 15, 2007 11:47:56 GMT
I think you're focusing on this a bit much. Maybe you should go lie down for a while in a cool dark room.
|
|
|
Post by saint on Mar 15, 2007 12:11:02 GMT
I think you're focusing on this a bit much. Maybe you should go lie down for a while in a cool dark room. Judging by your reply you indicate that I am crazy. Seeing as I work with you we both know you are the crazy one. I mean you have called yourself Dr Onion!
|
|
|
Post by Dr Onion on Mar 15, 2007 12:15:37 GMT
And what is wrong with that? He is my superhero alter-ego! Crazy indeed! Is Batman crazy? Is Spiderman crazy? Superheroes. Hounded by those they try to protect!
|
|
|
Post by saint on Mar 15, 2007 16:49:22 GMT
And what is wrong with that? He is my superhero alter-ego! Crazy indeed! Is Batman crazy? Is Spiderman crazy? Superheroes. Hounded by those they try to protect! Your no superhero I know for a fact you use your powers for evil
|
|
Lisa
Su Pollard
Campaigning for the ghostly return of Toby - always my favourite serial killer
Posts: 454
|
Post by Lisa on Mar 16, 2007 13:16:33 GMT
seeing as you two say that you're work collegues, could you not have this conversation in person and thereby not subject the rest of us to your forced wackyness?
|
|
|
Post by Dr Onion on Mar 16, 2007 13:40:15 GMT
Forced Wackyness?
|
|
|
Post by FeelsLikeKellyCrabtree on Mar 16, 2007 14:01:30 GMT
seeing as you two say that you're work collegues, could you not have this conversation in person and thereby not subject the rest of us to your forced wackyness? Thankyou, minicasino, for saying what we're all thinking. These two are just too krazy with a K for me.
|
|
|
Post by jetsetwilly on Mar 16, 2007 15:11:15 GMT
Shouldn't that be "k-erazy!!!" to fully reflect the level of wackiness?
|
|
|
Post by FeelsLikeKellyCrabtree on Mar 16, 2007 15:33:01 GMT
You're right.
It seems their k-erazy bonkerness knows no bounds if their contribution to the "Welcome" thread is anything to go by.
|
|
|
Post by saint on Mar 16, 2007 16:41:23 GMT
You're right. It seems their k-erazy bonkerness knows no bounds if their contribution to the "Welcome" thread is anything to go by. I think you will find that I didnt post anything crazy in the welcome thread and was in fact being honest.
|
|
|
Post by FeelsLikeKellyCrabtree on Mar 16, 2007 16:49:02 GMT
Smite me all you want saint, but it wasn't directed at you. I was talking in general about the new influx of people who all seem to know each other and even sit in the same office, yet still feel the need to converse via the internet.
EDIT: However, you did declare that you enjoyed talking to yourself and that you often found you were the only sane one. That, in my humble opinion, is the ramblings of someone who considers themselves wacky.
|
|
|
Post by saint on Mar 16, 2007 16:52:12 GMT
Smite me all you want saint, but it wasn't directed at you. I was talking in general about the new influx of people who all seem to know each other and even sit in the same office, yet still feel the need to converse via the internet. ok
|
|
|
Post by Dr Onion on Mar 16, 2007 17:19:31 GMT
I just went back and re-read my contribution to the "welcome" thread and I see no hint of wackiness, keerazeeness or anything else - my one attempt at a joke (and that is all it was) kinda fell flat when the "urban dickhead" decided to wade on in with both feet.
Sorry if you don't feel that this thread is up to the standard of the other threads on this board but there is no "forced wackyness" on our part - I thought the whole point of a message board was to post up messages and have others respond to them? No? Perhaps Saint and I got a bit carried away replying to each other as above but I see no mention in any board rules about this - maybe I'm wrong? I found this place by accident (the Jo Whiney thread was why I posted originally), looked around and a lot of what I read was very funny so I decided to stay.
I don't want to start anything here and I don't want any drama but is being "wacky" so wrong? I would refer you to my own website in my sig, on which I have spent a lot of time and effort in the past few months and which I feel is a good representation of both my personality and current mental state. I can't apologise if it (or indeed me) is not to your taste but if nothing else I don't pretend to be somene I'm not.
Thankyou for reading (or at least skipping to the end after reading the first sentence!)
Dr O
|
|
|
Post by lowculture.co.uk on Mar 16, 2007 17:28:58 GMT
I just went back and re-read my contribution to the "welcome" thread and I see no hint of wackiness, keerazeeness or anything else - my one attempt at a joke (and that is all it was) kinda fell flat when the "urban dickhead" decided to wade on in with both feet. Sorry if you don't feel that this thread is up to the standard of the other threads on this board but there is no "forced wackyness" on our part - I thought the whole point of a message board was to post up messages and have others respond to them? No? Perhaps Saint and I got a bit carried away replying to each other as above but I see no mention in any board rules about this - maybe I'm wrong? I found this place by accident (the Jo Whiney thread was why I posted originally), looked around and a lot of what I read was very funny so I decided to stay. I don't want to start anything here and I don't want any drama but is being "wacky" so wrong? I would refer you to my own website in my sig, on which I have spent a lot of time and effort in the past few months and which I feel is a good representation of both my personality and current mental state. I can't apologise if it (or indeed me) is not to your taste but if nothing else I don't pretend to be somene I'm not. Thankyou for reading (or at least skipping to the end after reading the first sentence!) Dr O Don't worry about it, you've been fine. Not your fault someone in your office came on here and acted like a total knobend.
|
|
|
Post by xenomaniac on Mar 16, 2007 19:13:24 GMT
They are two distinct species, not only that but they have evolved on entirely different planets. I don't see any reason to think they could breed.
|
|
|
Post by saint on Mar 16, 2007 19:16:23 GMT
They are two distinct species, not only that but they have evolved on entirely different planets. I don't see any reason to think they could breed. Maybe so, But in Star Trek there is interbreeding everywhere. In fact aint Spock half human half vulcan
|
|
|
Post by xenomaniac on Mar 16, 2007 19:51:28 GMT
They are two distinct species, not only that but they have evolved on entirely different planets. I don't see any reason to think they could breed. Maybe so, But in Star Trek there is interbreeding everywhere. In fact aint Spock half human half vulcan In Star Trek all the main humanoid races came about through an ancient race that scattered DNA across the galaxy. This goes someway to explain how they can interbreed.
|
|
|
Post by Cherubic on Mar 17, 2007 9:59:46 GMT
Xenomaniac - I was going to post exactly the same thing (both the science part and the star trek part) but was too ashamed of my inner geek. I salute you.
|
|
|
Post by xenomaniac on Mar 17, 2007 13:19:39 GMT
Xenomaniac - I was going to post exactly the same thing (both the science part and the star trek part) but was too ashamed of my inner geek. I salute you. Unfortunately my inner geek is also my outer geek. Judging by my karma I'm not so sure this was a genuine thread about interstella-biology.
|
|
|
Post by Cherubic on Mar 18, 2007 0:24:15 GMT
I just watched Episode III again. I forgot how bad it was. It makes Highlander look good.
|
|
|
Post by Dr Onion on Mar 21, 2007 6:50:01 GMT
Maybe so, But in Star Trek there is interbreeding everywhere. In fact aint Spock half human half vulcan In Star Trek all the main humanoid races came about through an ancient race that scattered DNA across the galaxy. This goes someway to explain how they can interbreed. Hmmmm..always saw that explanation as a bit of a "Deus ex machina" personally - plus it was "Weasley" who asked the question if memory serves and he just annoyed me! As far as breeding Wookies and Ewoks? Who's to say that they aren't related? Lucas was going to have the final battle filled with Wookies until he changed his mind and went for the "cute and cuddly" option instead! Or...The Empire certainly have the resources to experiment with cross breeding species if they so wished - given the type of organisation it is then I'd be really suprised if they weren't doing this already. Plus, never underestimate the Power of the Force!
|
|