|
Post by David Hunter on Mar 17, 2008 13:27:47 GMT
Last week the Vatican announced 7 new deadly sins for the modern age:
1: genetic modification 2: carrying out experiments on humans 3: polluting the environment 4: causing social injustice 5: causing poverty 6: becoming obscenely wealthy 7: taking drugs
My problem with the new sins are that, well, they're all a bit dull. At least with the old sins you could have a bit of fun breaking them! The new sins are all a bit vague. If I decided to have botox (I haven't) have I broken 1, 2 and 3 and possibly even 5? In fact I might have broken them all! Do they mean illegal drugs, or am I hurting God when I have that Lemsip? And isn't the Vatican itself guilty of sin number 6? I'm not really sure why they've decided to do this, but it'll be fun seeing how Magnum interpret these new sins as a lolly flavour.
Incidentally, the punishments for the original sins were: Pride - Broken on the wheel Envy - Put in freezing water Gluttony - Forced to eat rats, toads, and snakes Lust - Smothered in fire and brimstone Anger - Dismembered alive Greed - Put in cauldrons of boiling oil Sloth - Thrown in snake pits
There's definitely a game show in there somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by xenomaniac on Mar 17, 2008 17:00:22 GMT
Ohh thats quite funny. I really don't know why they bothered, the old ones are still very much alive and kicking round my place. Maybe they've been looking at the stats for Heaven admissions and they need a boost?
I think with botox you'd only be breaking 3 and 7 although I suppose supporting drug companies could throw in 1, 4 and 5.
I shall watch the soaps tonight and see which list gets the most ticks.
|
|
|
Post by FeelsLikeKellyCrabtree on Mar 17, 2008 17:30:03 GMT
I'm surprised there's no mention of chucking it up mens bums.
|
|
|
Post by Robbing the Dead on Mar 17, 2008 17:37:58 GMT
I think bumming is covered by lust.
|
|
|
Post by Steven on Mar 17, 2008 18:20:56 GMT
I think bumming is covered by lust. That's an old sin, though, and presumably the new sins have superceded the old ones. And since there's no mention of bumming in the new list, that means it's officially okay. Vatican-approved bumming for everyone! Hooray!
|
|
|
Post by Robbing the Dead on Mar 17, 2008 18:27:21 GMT
Isn't Vatican-approved bumming called paedophilia?
|
|
|
Post by Rad on Mar 17, 2008 19:14:42 GMT
Steven's avatar has freaked me out, it's like we've gone back in time two years.
Number 2 on the list is a bit vague isn't it? Does that rule out clinical trials? What about experiments on bodies of dead people?
|
|
|
Post by Robbing the Dead on Mar 17, 2008 19:20:07 GMT
Am I going to hell because I did psychology experiments at uni... oh no.
|
|
|
Post by treacle on Mar 17, 2008 23:34:45 GMT
Why add more? The existing ones aren't very succesful as it is. Setting themselves up for failure I say!
Yes 2 is very vague. Just physical or mental or.... whit?
Actually, come to think of it, I like the idea of modern sins. I'm going to make my own based around my new diet/exercise plan which will be life changing.... maybe.
|
|
|
Post by David Hunter on Mar 17, 2008 23:43:24 GMT
The more I think about them, the more they sound like new Commandments rather than new Sins. But then I suppose they can't call them Commandments as the original 10 appeared to Moses on tablets and I think these days we might need a bit more proof if they announced there were a new set.
|
|
|
Post by Robbing the Dead on Mar 18, 2008 0:21:46 GMT
I dunno, the Mormons bought a cock and bull story in the nineteenth century.
|
|
|
Post by lockjawsghost on Mar 18, 2008 9:51:16 GMT
number 7 seems a bit hypocritical to me, seeing as jesus used cannabis oil to annoint his followers. he might have used magic mushrooms as well.
|
|